Supreme Court of Iowa· 2/20/1974
State v. Smith
Citations
- 215 N.W.2d 225
- 1974 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1273
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[t]here must be a showing that the prejudice to the legitimate interests of the defendant overbalances the potential disruption of proceedings already in progress” [internal quotation marks omitted]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Mason, Rees, Uhlenhopp, Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Russell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-12-15· cited 70×
- State v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-09-15· cited 33×
- Williams v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1982-12-17· cited 27×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-11-13· cited 25×
- State v. LarmondSupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-06-30· cited 21×
- State v. GradySupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-07-31· cited 14×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-04-24· cited 13×
- State v. JochimsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-04-14· cited 11×
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-02-18· cited 9×
- State v. McCraySupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-07-31· cited 6×
- State of Iowa v. James Allen WehrCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2014-04-30· cited 6×
- Houston v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-11-17· cited 5×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DagueSupreme Court of Iowa· 1973-03-28· cited 21×
- United States v. Linwood WhiteD.C. Circuit· 1970-05-08· cited 18×
- People v. HolcombMichigan Court of Appeals· 1973-05-25· cited 16×
- United States v. Eulogio Ramiro ClausellSecond Circuit· 1968-01-17· cited 9×
- Bailey v. BroderickSupreme Court of Iowa· 1973-11-14· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.