State v. Feddersen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that since defense counsel’s affidavits recited hearsay, they were insufficient to support a new trial motion on ground of newly discovered evidence
• “In eliminating the requirement of corroboration of a rape victim’s testimony, the legislature rejected this concept as a discredited anachronism. We now do likewise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).