Hawaii Supreme Court· 2/26/1996

State v. Jackson

Citations

912 P.2d 71
81 Haw. 39

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the defendant’s right to confrontation was not violated “given that defense counsel voluntarily terminated the recross-examination because the intended line of questioning became redundant”
holding that \the scope and extent of cross and recross-examination of a witness is within the sound discretion of the trial judge\
observing that a remedy that increases congestion in the courts “disgraces the administration of justice”
stating that six months is construed as one hundred eighty days
“The scope and extent of cross and recross-examination of a witness is within the sound discretion of the trial judge.”
evidence that victim rebuffed defendant’s sexual advances was sufficient to establish absence of consent and to establish the element of “compulsion” under HRS § 707-733(l)(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.