Skip to main content

State v. Mundon.

Citations

  • 129 Haw. 1
  • 292 P.3d 205
  • 2012 Haw. LEXIS 385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that references by prosecutor and witnesses to the complaining witness as \the victim\ were harmless error
  • adopting the “collateral estoppel” principle from Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 90 S.Ct. 1189, 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970)
  • trial court on remand should instruct witnesses to refrain from calling complaining witness \victim\ because the term undermines presumption of innocence
  • “[U]nless there are good reasons found by the court for permitting otherwise, the court should instruct all counsel that they and their witnesses must refrain from using the term [victim].”
  • “. . . unless there are good reasons found by the court for permitting otherwise, the court should instruct all counsel that they and their witnesses must refrain from using the term.”
  • \use of the term 'victim' in the limited circumstances of this case was not prejudicial to [the defendant]\ where court sustained an objection to use of the term by a witness but overruled objections to the state's use of the term during the testimony of three police officers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nakayama, Acoba, Mekenna, Pollack, Nishimura, Recktenwald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.