Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Bartolome

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under HRCP Rule 52(a), a trial court \was not required to issue findings of fact\ when deciding an HRCP Rule 60(b) motion
• reasserting that an HRCP Rule 26 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAII REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER ** (b) motion may be treated as an HRCP Rule 59(e) motion for purposes of HRAP Rule (4)(a)(3) tolling if made within ten days of the entry of judgment
• \An appellate court does not have to address matters for which the appellant has failed to present discernible argument.\
• \An appellate court does not have to address matters for which the appellant has failed to present discernible argument.\
• citation 3 Beselt's trial attorneys and the dates of their withdrawal are as follows: (1) Matson Kelley and Alex Wilkins withdrew in May 2017; (2) James J. Bickerton, Nathan P. Roehrig, and Robert S. Miyashita withdrew in May 2018; (3) Michael J. Green and Peter C. Hsieh (Hsieh

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).