Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/15/2023

State v. Iverson

Citations

2023 Ohio 1601

Syllabus

Defendant appeals imposition of consecutive sentences. Record supported consecutive sentence findings. Appeals court lacked authority to modify or vacate sentence based on argument that record did not support findings under R.C. 2929.11 and R.C. 2929.12. Record reflected that the court considered those statutes. Sentence was not otherwise contrary to law.

Judges: Byrne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Murphy
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-01-13· cited 3×
State v. Metz
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-29· cited 1×
State v. Davis
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-07· cited 1×
State v. Halbert
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-01
State v. Wright
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-12

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
State v. Gwynne
Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-12-23· cited 142×
State v. Motz
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-08· cited 22×
State v. Shiveley
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-14· cited 15×
State v. Richey
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-06· cited 14×
State v. Day
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-25· cited 7×
State v. Lopez-Cruz
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-30· cited 7×
State v. Hunter
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-24· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.