Skip to main content

State v. Day

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 164

Syllabus

While appellant's individual sentences were not contrary to law, the trial court erred in ordering appellant to serve his sentences consecutively without first making the requisite consecutive sentence findings.

Judges: Piper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.