State v. Davis

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 2382

Syllabus

Defendant's convictions for trafficking in drugs (with a major drug offender specification) and for engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where recordings of the defendant's phone calls demonstrated he was complicit and advised his fiancé about the quantity and price of methamphetamine sold to a confidential informant. It could be inferred from recorded phone conversations that this was an ongoing enterprise. Although the trial court improperly admitted a lab report into evidence that was not timely provided to Defendant, the Defendant identified no prejudicial errors made at trial.