Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/5/1997

State v. Coburn

Citations

934 P.2d 579
146 Or. App. 653
1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that the Supreme Court’s holding in Davis II pertained to the application of the “400%” rule to the indeterminate portion of a dangerous offender sentence
a determinate sentence is the part of an indeterminate term “that the offender has to serve before becoming eligible for release to post-prison supervision” (emphasis in original)
unlike a sentencing error determined on direct appeal, sentencing error determined on post-conviction did not result in a blank slate on sentencing issues but only for correction of the original error
“Irrespective of the shifting arguments of both parties on appeal, it is clear that the issue before us is the same as the one squarely presented to the resentencing courtf.]”
where court initially sentenced the defendant as dangerous offender, on remand from post-conviction proceeding, sentencing court was not free to impose a sentence other than a dangerous offender sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deits, De Muniz Haselton, De Muniz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.