Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/8/2004

State v. Gornick

Citations

102 P.3d 734
196 Or. App. 397
2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

refusing to infer from defendant’s admission to indictment allegations and general guilty plea that defendant had waived right to jury trial pursuant to Blakely
refusing to infer from defendant’s admission to indictment allegations and general guilty plea that defendant had waived right to jury trial pursuant to Blakely
rejecting argument that aggravating factors must be pleaded in the indictment
a waiver of the constitutional right to a jury trial cannot be presumed from a silent record, but requires express consent
“To be valid, a waiver must be an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
a waiver of the constitutional right to a jury trial cannot be presumed from a silent record, but requires express consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Brewer, Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.