Skip to main content

State v. Islam

Citations

  • 359 Or. 796
  • 377 P.3d 533
  • 2016 Ore. LEXIS 406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, in theft case, retail seller was not entitled to restitution for lost profits absent evidence that seller incurred lost profits
  • concluding that the measure of economic damages for a seller in a theft case is the same measure of damages that would be available to the seller in a tort action for conversion
  • the mea- sure of restitution for a stolen item is the fair market value of the item when it was stolen
  • \[R]estitution under ORS 137.106 is informed by principles enunciated in civil cases concerning recoverable economic damages.\ (Citation omitted.)
  • defining when restitution may be awarded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baimer, Kistler, Walters, Landau, Baldwin, Brewer, Nakamoto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Islam

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.