Oregon Supreme Court· 12/30/1955
Parker v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc.
Citations
- 291 P.2d 709
- 206 Or. 187
- 56 A.L.R. 2d 382
- 1955 Ore. LEXIS 324
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “ ‘special damages’ [are] those naturally but not nec- essarily resulting from the breach” of a contract (emphasis omitted)
- explaining that “ ‘special damages’ [are] those naturally but not nec- essarily resulting from the breach” of a contract (emphasis omitted)
- “In every case actual damages sustained must be established by evidence upon which their existence and amount may be determined with reasonably certainty.”
- “In every case actual damages sustained must be established by evidence upon which their existence and amount may be determined with reasonable certainty.”
- “In every case actual damages sustained must be established by evidence upon which their existence and amount may be determined with reasonable certainty. Speculative damages are never allowed.”
- “Where defendant’s wrongful act has deprived plaintiff temporarily of the use and enjoyment of his property, plaintiff is entitled to recover therefor, and is not limited to the mere cost of restoring the property to its former condition.” (Citations omitted.)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tooze, Warner, Toozas, Brand, Latourette
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Unverzagt v. Young Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1968-11-12· cited 67×
- S. J. Groves & Sons Company v. Warner CompanyThird Circuit· 1978-04-17· cited 62×
- Smithson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1991-11-22· cited 61×
- Bixler v. First Nat. Bank of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-11-17· cited 46×
- Kirby Building Systems v. Mineral Explorations Co.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1985-08-01· cited 37×
- Continental Plants Corp. v. Measured Marketing Service, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-04-02· cited 35×
- CROSS ET UX v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court· 1962-04-18· cited 32×
- State v. IslamOregon Supreme Court· 2016-06-30· cited 32×
- Douglas Construction Corp. v. Mazama Timber Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1970-07-01· cited 24×
- Walker v. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-04-27· cited 20×
- Shea-S&m Ball, a Joint Venture v. Massman-Kiewit-Early, a Joint VentureD.C. Circuit· 1979-09-06· cited 19×
- White v. BelloOregon Supreme Court· 1976-12-09· cited 18×
- Smith v. ABELOregon Supreme Court· 1957-10-23· cited 18×
- Senior Estates, Inc. v. Bauman Homes, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-08-07· cited 16×
- Valley Inland Pacific Constructors, Inc. v. Clackamas Water District No. 2Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-12-10· cited 16×
- Edward M. Crough, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-04-05· cited 15×
- Teeples v. TolsonD. Oregon· 1962-05-22· cited 14×
- South Cheyenne Water & Sewer District v. StundonWyoming Supreme Court· 1971-03-31· cited 13×
- State v. FerraraCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-02-13· cited 10×
- Rubicon Global Ventures, Inc. v. Chongqing Zongshen Group Import/Export Corp.D. Oregon· 2016-12-30· cited 10×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.