Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/28/2017
State v. Rosette
Citations
- 410 P.3d 362
- 289 Or. App. 581
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that conversion is the comparable civil action to determine the amount of restitution for the crime of theft
- in sen- tencing the defendant for first-degree theft of a Bobcat, trial court did not err in awarding restitution for damages that occurred during the time period the defendant admitted the Bobcat was in his possession
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aoyagi, Dehoog, Egan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
- State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court· 1981-12-09· cited 98×
- State v. RamosOregon Supreme Court· 2016-02-19· cited 74×
- State v. BrayOregon Supreme Court· 2007-06-01· cited 64×
- Hall v. WorkOregon Supreme Court· 1960-08-10· cited 45×
- Hudson v. Peavey Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-07-06· cited 36×
- State v. IslamOregon Supreme Court· 2016-06-30· cited 32×
- State v. SeggermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-03· cited 19×
- Eldridge v. HoeferOregon Supreme Court· 1904-08-15· cited 19×
- Becker v. Pacific Forest Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-06-17· cited 18×
- Graf v. Don Rasmussen Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-03-19· cited 17×
- State v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-11-14· cited 16×
- State v. HowettCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-10-16· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.