Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/2/2019
State v. Chastain
Citations
- 299 Or. App. 646
- 451 P.3d 646
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting as unpreserved “more specific” objections to par- ticular aspects of a restitution award when those objections were raised for the first time on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kistler, S. J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hall v. WorkOregon Supreme Court· 1960-08-10· cited 45×
- Hayes Oyster Co. v. DulcichCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-10-04· cited 36×
- State v. IslamOregon Supreme Court· 2016-06-30· cited 32×
- Department of Revenue v. River's Edge Investments, LLCOregon Supreme Court· 2016-06-30· cited 18×
- State v. RosetteCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-12-28· cited 2×
- State v. MolesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-11-21· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.