State v. Fox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that one of the leg- islature’s purposes in creating the restitution framework was to provide a “substitute” civil proceeding
• “[State v. Ramos, 358 Or 581, 368 P3d 446 (2016

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Mann
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-11-29· cited 7×
• Providence Health & Services-Oregon v. Mancuso
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-01-05· cited 2×
• State v. Wagnon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-02-01· cited 2×
• State v. Halvorson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-22· cited 2×
• State v. Halvorson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-28· cited 1×
• State v. Rich
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-29· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Peeples v. Lampert
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 389×
• Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLC
  Supreme Court· 2015-06-15· cited 308×
• State v. Ramos
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-02-19· cited 74×
• State v. McKinney/Shiffer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2022-03-03· cited 63×
• Montara Owners Assn. v. La Noue Development, LLC
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-06-18· cited 55×
• State v. Islam
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-06-30· cited 32×
• Huffstutter v. Lind
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-06-14· cited 31×
• Osborne v. Hay
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-10-24· cited 21×
• State v. Kirschner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-02-19· cited 6×
• State v. Fox
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-14· cited 5×