Skip to main content

State v. Ibarra

Citations

  • 355 N.W.2d 125
  • 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that due process requires that criminal statutes “not be so vague that persons of common intelligence must guess at their meanings”
  • the standard for reviewing the sufficiency of evidence supporting criminal convictions “remains the same regardless of whether a court or jury heard the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coyne, Wahl, Yetka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.