State v. Kobow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, even when evidence is constitutionally required, the district court must “weigh the probative value against the prejudicial effect of testimony regarding her sexual conduct under [rule 412 1]”
• explaining that, even when evidence is constitutionally required, the district court must “weigh the probative value against the prejudicial effect of testimony regarding her sexual conduct under [rule 412 1]”
• explaining that, even when evidence is constitutionally required, the district court must “weigh the probative value against the prejudicial effect of testimony regarding her sexual conduct under [rule 412 1]”
• explaining that, even when evidence is constitutionally required, the district court must “weigh the probative value against the prejudicial effect of testimony regarding her sexual conduct under [rule 412 1]”
• explaining that, even when evidence is constitutionally required, the district court must “weigh the probative value against the prejudicial effect of testimony regarding her sexual conduct under [rule 412 1]”
• agreeing “with the trial court that the term ‘sexual conduct’ as used in Minn. Stat. § 609.347 includes ‘allegations of sexual abuse’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).