Skip to main content

State v. Norgaard

Citations

  • 136 N.W.2d 628
  • 272 Minn. 48
  • 1965 Minn. LEXIS 632

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that it was error to inquire into the age of a rape victim after the fact of the rape conviction was properly admitted as impeachment, but that the error was not prejudicial enough to merit reversal
  • determining that it was error to inquire into the age of a rape victim after the fact of the rape conviction was properly admitted as impeachment, but that the error was not prejudicial enough to merit reversal
  • “It has been held that prejudice resulting in the minds of the jury by asking improper questions relating to other bad acts may require reversal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Norgaard

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.