Skip to main content

Hill v. State

Citations

  • 483 N.W.2d 57
  • 1992 Minn. LEXIS 109
  • 1992 WL 75676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “while the main focus should be on the offense definition, the sentencing court should also consider ‘the nature’ of the offense and the sentence received by the offender” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gardebring, Keith, Tomuanovich, Wahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.