Skip to main content

State v. Hubbard

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 1740

Syllabus

The trial court did not err when it overruled appellant's motion to suppress. The record established that the police officer had a reasonable articulable suspicion to stop the vehicle in which appellant was a passenger because of a window tint violation and speeding. The trial court did not err when it found that the police had probable cause to perform a warrantless search of the entire vehicle, including the trunk and its contents. The appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to specifically challenge the warrantless search of the trunk in a memorandum filed after the suppression hearing. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Donovan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.