Skip to main content

State v. Howard

Citations

  • 198 P.3d 146
  • 287 Kan. 686
  • 2008 Kan. LEXIS 742

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that trial judge could clarify sentence in follow up hearing when original sentence was “indistinct”
  • finding that trial judge could clarify sentence in follow up hearing when original sentence was \indistinct\
  • noting that court has applied same review standards to motions to correct illegal sentence and habeas motions under K.S.A. 60-1507
  • finding sentencing occurs when the court pronounces the sentence from the bench
  • K.S.A. 22-3504, which pertains to illegal sentences, and K.S.A. 60-1507 are treated the same for purposes of determining when an evidentiay hearing is required.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.