State v. D.W.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Randle to find contemporaneous objection rule was satisfied because a motion to exclude evidence was pending, the State argued relevance at trial, and the district court ruled on relevance and undue prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Romey
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2025-12-05

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Meggerson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2020-10-23· cited 155×
• State v. Tague
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-03-22· cited 101×
• State v. Marinelli
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-04-13· cited 78×
• State v. Cash
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-10-14· cited 61×
• State v. Randle
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2020-05-01· cited 38×
• State v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2010-08-20· cited 30×
• State v. Scheetz
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2024-01-12· cited 28×
• State v. Shields
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2022-06-17· cited 25×
• State v. Howard
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-12-19· cited 24×
• State v. Newman
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2020-02-14· cited 7×