State v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In both cases, the district court is to make a prehminary examination to determine whether substantial questions of law or fact are raised, and, if the findings are in the negative, the court may summarily deny the motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Holmes
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2004-12-17· cited 161×
• State v. Kirby
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2002-01-25· cited 49×
• State v. Diggs
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-10-26· cited 28×
• State v. Howard
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-12-19· cited 24×
• State v. Barnes
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-01-19· cited 10×
• State v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-06-03· cited 8×
• State v. Kimsey
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-08-17

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Sperry
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-05-04· cited 65×
• United States v. Thomas Condon
  Seventh Circuit· 1999-03-09· cited 63×
• State v. Duke
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1997-10-31· cited 58×
• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-12-07· cited 36×
• Edwards v. State
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-05-11· cited 5×