Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/13/1986

State v. Thomas

Citations

720 P.2d 1059
239 Kan. 457
1986 Kan. LEXIS 364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting availability of nunc pro tunc orders to correct clerical mistakes, including “typographical errors, incorrect statute numbers, [or] failure to include the statute number”
rejecting Thomas' argument that nunc pro tunc order could change judgment to reflect his liability as an aider and abettor rather than as a principal
jurisdiction over an appeal of a motion to correct illegal sentence lies with the court that had jurisdiction to hear the original appeal
60-1507 creates a new case, not a criminal case, and proceeding is in the nature of a civil action
60-1507 creates a new case, not a criminal case, and proceeding is in the nature of a civil action
jurisdiction over appeal of motion to correct illegal sentence lies with court that had jurisdiction to hear original appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.