Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/20/1987
State v. Jones
Citations
- 358 S.E.2d 701
- 293 S.C. 54
- 1987 S.C. LEXIS 292
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In order to raise and preserve a Batson issue, the defendant must move for a hearing after the jury is selected but before it is sworn.”
- Batson claim should be made after jury is selected but before it is sworn
- abrogated on other grounds by State v. Chapman, 317 S.C. 302, 454 S.E.2d 317 (1995)
- abrogated on other grounds by State v. Chapman, 317 S.C. 302, 454 S.E.2d 317 (1995)
- Batson violation requires jury be quashed and selection begin de novo
- Batson violation requires jury be quashed and selection begin de novo
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Finney, Gregory, Harwell, Littlejohn, Ness
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MooreNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-08-29· cited 331×
- Tompkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-10-07· cited 307×
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-07-21· cited 259×
- Ex Parte BirdSupreme Court of Alabama· 1991-12-06· cited 258×
- Mallory v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1991-11-01· cited 221×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-04-29· cited 113×
- State v. HollowaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-01-24· cited 110×
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-05-03· cited 97×
- Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1989-11-09· cited 88×
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-03-13· cited 67×
- United States v. MooreUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1989-08-10· cited 55×
- State v. OglesbySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-05-15· cited 51×
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-02-13· cited 47×
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-08-30· cited 46×
- People v. DuncanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-03-13· cited 46×
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1991-07-03· cited 45×
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-25· cited 45×
- Tursio v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-12-15· cited 41×
- State v. TomlinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-09-05· cited 40×
- State v. MartinezSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-11-30· cited 32×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.