Skip to main content
· 9/23/1997

State v. Lindsley

Citations

  • 953 P.2d 1248
  • 191 Ariz. 195
  • 252 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 46
  • 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that we will uphold a restitution order “if it bears a reasonable relationship to the victim’s loss”
  • upholding a restitution award for a victim’s wages lost by voluntary attendance at court proceedings
  • upholding a restitution award for a victim's wages lost by voluntary attendance at court proceedings
  • requiring restitution for loss resulting from a defendant’s possession of stolen property, despite never being charged with theft
  • requiring the restitution award to “bear[] a reasonable relationship to the victim’s loss” (citations omitted)
  • affirming restitution award of victim’s lost wages incurred to attend trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lankford, Thompson, Toci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.