· 9/23/1997
State v. Lindsley
Citations
- 953 P.2d 1248
- 191 Ariz. 195
- 252 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 46
- 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 167
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that we will uphold a restitution order “if it bears a reasonable relationship to the victim’s loss”
- upholding a restitution award for a victim’s wages lost by voluntary attendance at court proceedings
- upholding a restitution award for a victim's wages lost by voluntary attendance at court proceedings
- requiring restitution for loss resulting from a defendant’s possession of stolen property, despite never being charged with theft
- requiring the restitution award to “bear[] a reasonable relationship to the victim’s loss” (citations omitted)
- affirming restitution award of victim’s lost wages incurred to attend trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lankford, Thompson, Toci
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.