State v. Scroggins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating restitution order and remanding where no determination made as to amount of victim’s loss
• “A court has discretion to set the amount of restitution according to the facts.”
• restitution cannot be imposed independently of sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-01-25· cited 37×
• State v. Fancher
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-10-01· cited 33×
• State v. Ellis
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-03-10· cited 32×
• State v. Steffy
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-10-01· cited 26×
• State v. Holguin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-05-04· cited 18×
• State v. Reynolds
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-05-28· cited 17×
• State v. Guadagni
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-02-29· cited 16×
• State v. Proctor
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-09-08· cited 16×
• State v. Howard
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-07-18· cited 15×
• State v. Quijada
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2019-03-28· cited 15×
• State v. Freeman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-03-18· cited 13×
• State v. Nuckols
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-04-12· cited 5×
• E.H. v. Hon Slayton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2021-04-20· cited 2×
• State v. Reed
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-10-20· cited 1×
• State of Arizona v. Jerry Alan Nuckols
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-04-12
• State of Arizona v. Donald Allen Guadagni
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-02-29
• E. H. v. Hon. Slayton
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2025-04-30

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State in Interest of Besendorfer
  Utah Supreme Court· 1977-08-09· cited 14×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-11-01· cited 10×
• State v. King
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 6×