Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/27/2012

State v. Steffens

Citations

250 Or. App. 742
282 P.3d 888
2012 WL 2403543
2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“An officer’s knowledge of the defendant’s past conduct is relevant to the officer-safety inquiry; however, where past conduct is not coupled with Cite as 338 Or App 91 (2025
“An officer’s knowledge of the defendant’s past conduct is relevant to the officer-safety inquiry; however, where past conduct is not coupled with Cite as 338 Or App 91 (2025
where the defendant was “relaxed, unconcerned, and cooperative” during the traffic stop, the defendant’s recent arrest for possession of a concealed handgun did not support an inquiry into whether the defendant had weapons
“An officer’s knowledge of the defen- dant’s past conduct is relevant to the officer-safety inquiry; however, where past conduct is not coupled with any indica- tion that the defendant is currently dangerous, it is unlikely to be determinative.” (Emphasis in original.)
“An officer’s knowledge of the defendant’s past conduct is rele- vant to the officer-safety inquiry; however, where past con- duct is not coupled with any indication that the defendant is currently dangerous, it is unlikely to be determinative.” (Emphasis in original.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Duncan, Haselton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.