State v. Hodges

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that reserving the right to enter the premises in a lease does not confer authority to provide consent for warrantless search but also concluding suppression was unnecessary on other grounds
• providing that “where the court held that if lawfully obtained information establishes probable cause and, by itself and apart from any tainted information, would have justified issuance of the search warrant, the evidence seized pursuant to the warrant is admitted”
• landlord who had key to premises did not have authority to consent to search
• landlord who had key to premises did not have authority to consent to search
• landlord did not have authority to consent to search of premises even though “[ujnder the terms of the written agreement, [he] * * * specifically retained the right to enter the premises at any reasonable time to view the premises, to make repairs, or to show them to other prospective tenants”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Coyle
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-06-11· cited 149×
• State v. Zindros
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-02-15· cited 84×
• State v. Licari
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-04-17· cited 57×
• Commonwealth v. Davis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-11-24· cited 51×
• State v. Clark
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-09-11· cited 30×
• City of Golden Valley v. Wiebesick
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-07-19· cited 16×
• People v. Wagner
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-04-05· cited 15×
• State v. Kumpula
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-09-21· cited 13×
• State v. Metz
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-04-26· cited 13×
• State v. Lozar
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-07-31· cited 12×
• State v. Jacques
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-07-16· cited 12×
• State v. Fakler
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-08-13· cited 4×
• State v. Buswell
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-02-21· cited 2×
• In Re the Welfare of A.J.M.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-07-27· cited 2×
• State v. Dotson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-07-17· cited 2×
• State of Minnesota, Appellant/Cross-Respondent v. Seneca Warrior Steeprock, Respondent/Cross-Appellant
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-12-03

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rakas v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
• Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1978-05-23· cited 1,428×
• Burdeau v. McDowell
  Supreme Court· 1921-06-01· cited 1,253×
• Isaac L. James, Jr. v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1969-06-20· cited 132×
• Unnamed case
  First Circuit· 1976-06-29· cited 51×
• State v. Tungland
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-03-23· cited 17×
• State v. Lee
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-01-03· cited 13×