Supreme Court· 5/23/1978

Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.

Citations

436 U.S. 307
98 S. Ct. 1816
56 L. Ed. 2d 305
1978 U.S. LEXIS 26
8 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20434
6 OSHC (BNA) 1571

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that absent consent a warrant was constitutionally required in order to conduct administrative inspections under Sec. 8(a) of OSHA
holding that absent consent a warrant was constitutionally required in order to conduct administrative inspections under Sec. 8(a) of OSHA
holding that OSHA inspections were constitutionally permissible pursuant to administrative warrants based on less than criminal probable cause
recognizing that search warrants may be “executed without delay and without prior notice, thereby preserving the element of surprise”
holding that absent consent a warrant was constitutionally required in order to conduct administrative inspections under § 8(a) of OSHA
holding that absent consent a warrant was constitutionally required in order to conduct administrative inspections under § 8(a) of OSHA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Burger, Stewart, Marshall, Powell, Stevens, Blackmun, Rehnquist, Brennan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,023 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.