Skip to main content
· 6/20/1969

Isaac L. James, Jr. v. United States

Citations

  • 418 F.2d 1150
  • 135 U.S. App. D.C. 314
  • 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11846

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “dirty business” such as trickery and illegal acts often accompanies unjustifiable government intrusion
  • if the affidavit of one officer, by itself, “would be enough to support a magistrate’s finding of probable cause,” the illegal search by another officer need not be considered (emphasis supplied)
  • unusual angle or height of enhanced visual surveillance considered in determining degree of intrusion upon expectation of privacy
  • “When an affidavit in support of a search warrant contains information which is in part unlawfully obtained, the validity of a warrant and search depends on whether the untainted information, considered by itself, establishes probable cause for the warrant to issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamm, Leventhal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.