United States v. Daniel Chalan, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Cochiti Pueblo Indian’s desire to attend interview so as not to insult the Pueblo Governor did not convert interview into custodial setting
• concluding that a prima facie case existed for a Native American defendant to challenge where all four Native Americans in a jury-pool were excluded based on for-cause removals and peremptory challenges
• noting that even if Miranda rights are not violated, statements may be inadmissible if made involuntarily
• noting that even if Miranda rights are not violated, statements may be inadmissible if made involuntarily
• noting that in certain cases, a single peremptory challenge might establish a prima facie case of discrimination
• observing that use of a confession that is not “the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker ... offends due process ” (quotations omitted) (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).