Tenth Circuit· 3/3/1987

United States v. Daniel Chalan, Jr.

Citations

812 F.2d 1302
1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2758
22 Fed. R. Serv. 1200

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Cochiti Pueblo Indian’s desire to attend interview so as not to insult the Pueblo Governor did not convert interview into custodial setting
concluding that a prima facie case existed for a Native American defendant to challenge where all four Native Americans in a jury-pool were excluded based on for-cause removals and peremptory challenges
noting that even if Miranda rights are not violated, statements may be inadmissible if made involuntarily
noting that even if Miranda rights are not violated, statements may be inadmissible if made involuntarily
noting that in certain cases, a single peremptory challenge might establish a prima facie case of discrimination
observing that use of a confession that is not “the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker ... offends due process ” (quotations omitted) (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barrett, Seymour, Sam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

200 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.