Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1/14/1992
State v. Herrmann
Citations
- 479 N.W.2d 724
- 1992 Minn. App. LEXIS 28
- 1992 WL 3381
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that amenability to treatment and probation are offender- related factors that may support dispositional departure
- “When the crime charged requires ‘injury’ alone, then the sentencing court can depart from the presumptive sentence when the victim’s injuries are serious.”
- “The defendant’s amenability to probation or treatment is a relevant factor in determining whether a dispositional departure is warranted, but does not appear to bear on the issue of the appropriate duration of a sanction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schumacher, Klaphake, Davies
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-02-13· cited 171×
- State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-17· cited 160×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-02-08· cited 133×
- State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-07-15· cited 82×
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-02-03· cited 82×
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-10-26· cited 78×
- State v. Van GordenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-11-24· cited 63×
- State v. BestSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-12-22· cited 55×
- State v. BrusvenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-12-30· cited 45×
- State v. OttSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-01-06· cited 31×
- State v. PartlowSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-07-07· cited 28×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-10-23· cited 21×
- State v. LoitzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-05-07· cited 18×
- State v. MagnanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-01-07· cited 17×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-03-23· cited 13×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-12-24· cited 11×
- State v. VanWertSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-07-21· cited 10×
- State v. RasinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-08-02· cited 10×
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-06-07· cited 6×
- State v. SaharathCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-09-25· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.