State v. Behl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that crimes that occur in the victim’s zone of privacy, such as the victim’s bedroom, is an approved factor to consider in a departure
• stating that a 5 defendant’s amenability to probation does not support a durational departure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2018-05-14· cited 15×
• State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2015-09-08· cited 14×
• State v. Law
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-11-15· cited 9×
• State v. Kujak
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-01-15· cited 6×
• State v. Gebeck
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-10-30· cited 4×
• State v. Tze Thao
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-10-16· cited 2×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Garcia
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-02-13· cited 171×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-02-08· cited 133×
• State v. Evans
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-10-26· cited 131×
• State v. Ford
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-09-01· cited 110×
• State v. Back
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-12-09· cited 96×
• State v. Schantzen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-07-15· cited 82×
• State v. Behl
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-05-29· cited 66×
• State v. Givens
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-03-08· cited 64×
• State v. Best
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-12-22· cited 55×
• State v. Chaklos
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-02-10· cited 36×
• State v. Elkins
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-03-23· cited 16×
• State v. Herrmann
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-01-14· cited 8×
• State v. Esler
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-08-20· cited 7×
• State v. Behl
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-07-10· cited 3×