State v. Condon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that because officer had grounds to believe Condon had committed criminal vehicular operation, he had no right to refuse testing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jaworsky
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-08-31· cited 7×
• State v. Shriner
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-10-02· cited 5×
• State v. Nielsen
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-04-11· cited 4×
• State v. Heaney
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-03-30· cited 3×
• State v. Lee
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-06-17· cited 2×
• STATE, CITY OF BELLE PLAINE v. Stradcutter
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-09-09· cited 1×
• State v. Chaklos
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-12-02· cited 1×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Morissette v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1952-01-07· cited 3,056×
• Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-08-15· cited 177×
• State v. Oevering
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-06-23· cited 85×
• State v. Profit
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-17· cited 46×
• State v. McGee
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-04-27· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Barone
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-25· cited 40×
• State v. Speak
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-11-04· cited 34×
• State v. Warren
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-02-26· cited 33×
• State v. Aguirre
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 32×
• State v. Strong
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-06-12· cited 14×
• State v. Scott
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-08-06· cited 13×
• State v. Herrmann
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-01-14· cited 8×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-11-10· cited 3×
• State v. Dittel
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-01-08· cited 1×