State v. Herrera-Sorrosa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming that the defendant was detained unlawfully, the stop did not reveal information so as to cause the officer to request consent
• assuming that the defendant was detained unlawfully, the stop did not reveal information so as to cause the officer to request consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-31· cited 13×
• People v. Head
  California Court of Appeal· 1994-11-09· cited 3×
• State v. HERRERASORROSA
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-07-15· cited 1×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ball v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• State v. Holmes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 257×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 138×
• State v. Dominguez-Martinez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-06-02· cited 88×
• State v. Stanley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-04-17· cited 19×
• State v. Stanley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-03-13· cited 17×
• State v. Meyers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-04-22· cited 15×
• State v. Terhear
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-07-31· cited 13×
• State v. Austin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-12-11· cited 12×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-12-17· cited 11×
• State v. Daugaard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-07-24· cited 8×
• State v. Foster
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-02-21· cited 7×
• State v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-04· cited 6×
• State v. Wenger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-08-28· cited 4×
• State v. Wilkinson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-03-22· cited 3×
• State v. Wilkinson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-07-27· cited 1×