State v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirmed suppression of evidence seized from passenger’s purse following a consent search during a traffic stop because no independent basis to expand that stop existed
• because outstanding warrant was not discovered until after search of defendant’s purse, search was tainted by illegal stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. La France
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-07· cited 18×
• State v. Lantzsch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-15· cited 8×
• State v. Miears
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-03-15· cited 6×
• State v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-04· cited 6×
• State v. Herrera-Sorrosa
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-05-20· cited 4×
• State v. Presley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-08· cited 3×
• State v. $113,871 in U.S. Currency
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-25· cited 2×
• State v. Fugate
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-29

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-06-29· cited 279×
• State v. Bates
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-12-22· cited 243×
• State v. Dominguez-Martinez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-06-02· cited 88×
• State v. Aguilar
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-02-21· cited 40×
• State v. Dempster
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-12-06· cited 34×
• State v. Snyder
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-02-27· cited 22×
• State v. Bucholz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-08-12· cited 10×
• State v. Tetro
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-09-13· cited 8×
• State v. Foster
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-02-21· cited 7×
• Gentry v. States Steamship Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1961-12-13· cited 7×
• State v. Woods
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-04-26· cited 6×