Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/22/1998

State v. Meyers

Citations

958 P.2d 187
153 Or. App. 551
1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that applying amended rules of evidence to appeals of trial court orders decided when prior rules were in effect constitutes “a moving of the proverbial goal posts after the contest is over” that “raises serious questions of due process.”
explaining that applying amended rules of evidence to appeals of trial court orders decided when prior rules were in effect constitutes “a moving of the proverbial goal posts after the contest is over” that “raises serious questions of due process.”
declining to apply new evidentiary standard for first time on appeal because “[s]uch a moving of the proverbial goal posts after the contest is over raises serious questions of due process”
declining to apply new evidentiary standard for first time on appeal because \[s]uch a moving of the proverbial goal posts after the contest is over raises serious questions of due process\
changing the rules of evidence retroactively raises serious questions of due process
changing the rules of evidence retroactively raises serious questions of due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riggs, Landau, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.