Arizona Supreme Court· 6/30/1983

State v. Hensley

Citations

669 P.2d 58
137 Ariz. 80
1983 Ariz. LEXIS 230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining a statement that “do[es] not offer any benefit to the defendant in exchange for information” is not an impermissible promise
finding defendant did not give statement in reliance on promise that statement would not be admissible in court because defendant made the statement the next day to different police officers after being read his Miranda rights
statement by officer that suspect’s confession would not be admissible in court did not constitute a promise
confession “merely cumulative of other, overwhelming evidence on the same point”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.