Skip to main content
· 5/25/1983

State v. Finehout

Citations

  • 665 P.2d 570
  • 136 Ariz. 226
  • 1983 Ariz. LEXIS 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “I’m not going to say anymore until I talk to a lawyer” was unequivocal
  • holding statement that “I’m not going to say anymore until I talk to a lawyer” was an unequivocal request for an attorney that triggered Miranda
  • urging defendant to tell truth was interrogation when detectives “should have known that their appeals for honesty were reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response”
  • urging defendant to tell truth was interrogation when detectives “should have known that their appeals for honesty were reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response”
  • suggesting words “I ain’t going to say any more” unambiguously invoked Fifth Amendment
  • suggesting statement “I ain’t going to say any more” unambiguously invoked Fifth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.