· 5/25/1983
State v. Finehout
Citations
- 665 P.2d 570
- 136 Ariz. 226
- 1983 Ariz. LEXIS 199
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “I’m not going to say anymore until I talk to a lawyer” was unequivocal
- holding statement that “I’m not going to say anymore until I talk to a lawyer” was an unequivocal request for an attorney that triggered Miranda
- urging defendant to tell truth was interrogation when detectives “should have known that their appeals for honesty were reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response”
- urging defendant to tell truth was interrogation when detectives “should have known that their appeals for honesty were reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response”
- suggesting words “I ain’t going to say any more” unambiguously invoked Fifth Amendment
- suggesting statement “I ain’t going to say any more” unambiguously invoked Fifth Amendment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cameron, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Feldman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.