Court of Appeals of Kansas· 3/10/2006

State v. Henderson

Citations

35 Kan. App. 2d 241
129 P.3d 646
2006 Kan. App. LEXIS 223

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

child's videotaped statements about sexual assault made during interview conducted by detective and social worker who were both members of Exploited and Missing Child Unit were testimonial
the court noted that “[cjausation between the action of the defendant and the witness’ absence appears key” and the State did not cite any authority showing that the doctrine of forfeiture had been applied solely due to age
the court noted that \[c]ausation between the action of the defendant and the witness' absence appears key\ and the State did not cite any authority showing that the doctrine of forfeiture had been applied solely due to age
the court noted that “[c]ausation between the action of the defendant and the witness’ absence appears key” and the State did not cite any authority showing that the doctrine of forfeiture had been applied solely due to age

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green, Larson, Wahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.