Washington Supreme Court· 10/8/1998

State v. Head

Citations

136 Wash. 2d 619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

emphasizing duty of trial judge in bench trial “to focus attention on the evidence supporting each element of the charged crime”
Supreme Court refuses to address issues raised on appeal in the absence of required findings and conclusions
The court’s “failure to enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by CrR 6.1(d) requires remand.”
Supreme Court refuses to address issues raised on appeal in the absence of required findings and conclusions
when trial court failed to enter written findings and conclusions, remand was the proper course of action
trial court' s written memorandum opinion is equivalent of a trial court' s oral expression of its informal opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Madsen, Sanders

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.