State v. McGary

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government need not prove all statements in an information; surplus statements do not become an element of the crime
• noting that the primary purpose of requiring findings is to allow the appellate court to fully review the questions raised on appeal
• findings and conclusions may be submitted and entered even while an appeal is pending; because defendant had not established prejudice from the delayed findings, there was no error
• findings and conclusions may be submitted and entered even while an appeal is pending; because defendant had not established prejudice from the delayed findings, there was no error
• given that the vehicle identification number was included only in the information, it did not become \an element of the crime\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).