Washington Supreme Court· 11/2/1995

State v. Alvarez

Citations

128 Wash. 2d 1
904 P.2d 754

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a remand for entry of revised written findings without additional evidence was the appropriate remedy for noncompliance with JuCR 7.11(d), which requires findings to state the ultimate facts supporting each element of the charged offense
recognizing plain and unambiguous language of the statute but noting different and inconsistent remedies applied
recognizing plain and unambiguous language of the statute but noting different and inconsistent remedies applied
concluding 9A.46.020 sets forth the necessary elements of harassment and does not require a showing of `repeated invasions of a person's privacy' or a `pattern of harassment'
case remanded where evidence supported conviction but trial court failed to enter findings on ultimate facts
no double jeopardy violation in remand for entry of findings and conclusions in the absence of a prior acquittal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Alexander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

106 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.