Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/6/2011

State v. A.M.

Citations

163 Wash. App. 414
260 P.3d 229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[Penetration of the buttocks, but not the anus, does not meet the ordinary meaning of ‘sexual intercourse.’ ”
“Where there are findings of fact, as in a bench trial, unchallenged findings of fact are verities on appeal.”
“[P]enetration of the buttocks, but not the anus, does not meet the ordinary meaning of ‘sexual intercourse.’”
“Where there are findings of fact, as in a bench trial, unchallenged findings of fact are verities on appeal.”
“Where written findings and conclusions have an unambiguous meaning, they are not susceptible to being given a different meaning on appeal through resort to an examination of the lower court’s oral ruling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker, Grosse, Appelwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.