Skip to main content

State v. Tebelman

Citations

  • 211 N.E.3d 150
  • 2023 Ohio 882

Syllabus

If a significant trial witness recants his or her prior testimony, courts must apply a two-step analysis. First, the court must determine the credibility of the recantation. Second, the trial court must determine whether this testimony could have affected the outcome of the trial. In general, purported recantation testimony is viewed with suspicion.

Judges: Willamowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.