Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/17/2017

State v. Videen

Citations

2017 Ohio 8608

Syllabus

The trial court's decision overruling Appellant's Crim.R. 33 motion for new trial without a hearing was not an abuse of discretion, as the motion was untimely and Appellant failed to provide clear and convincing evidence showing that he was unavoidably prevented from timely filing the motion. Affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Hayden
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-29· cited 3×
State v. Taylor
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-07· cited 2×
State v. Jackson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-10· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Schiebel
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
State v. Matthews
Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-04-15· cited 92×
State v. Gillispie
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-13· cited 18×
State v. Metcalf
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-28· cited 17×
State v. Lenoir
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-15· cited 17×
State v. Hiler
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-15· cited 16×
State v. Videen
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-05· cited 4×
State v. Simpson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-26· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.