State v. Haws

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, in considering whether the durational component for fourth-degree assault should be included in the instruction, “we ask whether the issue of duration was before the jury”
• trial court denying the defendant’s request to include an instruction that substantial pain “excludes pain that is fleeting”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dumdei
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-01-02· cited 13×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-12-28· cited 6×
• State v. Higginbotham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-30· cited 6×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• Hernandez v. Barbo MacHinery Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-04-24· cited 92×
• State v. McNally
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-04-20· cited 65×
• State v. Roberts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-08-15· cited 21×
• State v. Guzman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-01-27· cited 20×
• State v. Harryman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-06· cited 19×
• State v. Long
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-21· cited 16×
• State v. Guckert
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-18· cited 12×
• State v. Egeland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-01-29· cited 7×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-09· cited 6×
• State v. Black
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-18· cited 5×