Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1/27/2016

State v. Guzman

Citations

276 Or. App. 208
366 P.3d 816
2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[D]irect evidence that the victim suffered pain that is ‘substantial,’ as a matter of law, is sufficient to submit the question to the jury.”
“[D]irect evidence that the victim suffered pain that is ‘substantial,’ as a matter of law, is sufficient to submit the question to the jury.”
in the absence of direct evidence of the degree of pain, a court must determine whether the evidence supports “[r]easonable inferences from circumstantial evidence”
victim was panicked and crying hysterically and had scratches and welts on her face and arms; some swelling on both cheeks, around her eyes, and on the left side of her forehead; and more pronounced swelling on the right side of her forehead
setting forth the stan- dard of review
substantial pain inquiry is “subjective”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Nakamoto, Tempore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.