State v. Black

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• failure to instruct on corroboration requirement was harmless error where uncontested out-of-court statement gave same account of the defendant’s involvement as accomplice witness testimony
• accomplice witness instructions required if the record demonstrates “a substantial objective basis for believing that, more likely than not,” a witness aided or abetted in the commission of an offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ramos
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-26· cited 15×
• State v. Miranda
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-14· cited 9×
• State v. Egeland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-01-29· cited 7×
• State v. Haws
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-05· cited 3×
• State v. Savage
  Washington County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-05-25

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• State v. Barnes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-09-08· cited 74×
• State v. Hull
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 28×
• Carter v. Mote
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-02-21· cited 19×
• State v. Lockwood
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-12-10· cited 17×
• State v. McMillan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-05-04· cited 13×